If Your People Hate Change, Read This
People claim to hate change, but if that’s true, why do they enjoy going on vacation, finding a new favorite restaurant, or getting a tax rebate check in the mail?
a
If your staffers don’t like change, then you’re doing something wrong. People resist workplace changes, because these changes tend to be perceived as unexpected, disruptive, and negative. But you can do something to improve all that…
The Power of Wildly Successful Projects™ (WSPs)
Leaders who build a track record of Wildly Successful Projects reach organizational goals that earn them the trust of their staffers and make gaining buy in and cooperation on future projects a breeze. Here’s what every leader and manager needs to know.
First, whenever you introduce a change such as an initiative or project, a software program, a standard procedure, etc. take proper action to avoid making two common mistakes:
- Think through the new change completely, from strategy to tactics and execution, before you introduce it. Too often, leaders introduce ideas that lack substance or a plan for their completion, and as a result, those ideas fade into the ether. People waste time trying to figure out what to do with your ideas, and when enough of those unfulfilled ideas go unrealized, staffers lose confidence in what you have to say.
- Finish one initiative before beginning another. Studies show that the number of projects that people can work on successfully at any given time is two projects; more than that overwhelms labor and maxes-out resources. Don’t confuse a task with a project. Striking a balance for you and your employees ensures that projects are completed and that your crew enjoys success on the job.
Contrast these two types of managers. Manager 1, Kate, attends a conference, returns to the office excited to share a list of new initiatives with her staff, but the staff already have several unfinished projects on their plates. She drops the ideas on employees’ laps and leaves it up to others to figure out the details.
Manager 2, Kyle, returns from the same conference, but instead of rushing to share all his ideas immediately, he does some research over the course of the next week to be sure that he introduces a single best idea that will positively impact his staff. He explains that the ROI on the project will earn the firm $200,000 over the next year, and that end-of-year bonuses will come from this initiative. Already, even before he has laid out the tactical plan, you can already surmise that this idea has greater potential than Kate’s idea to become a WSP.
Mimic Kyle’s approach to change and watch how workplace resistance to change is replaced with an eagerness for future changes. When you develop a reputation for introducing WSPs, people will love change.
































Take the experience I had at the David Leadbetter Golf Clinic in Florida. While working at a convention, I had the opportunity to sign up for some extra activities, if my plans permitted. I could not create the time to take the 140 MPH NASCAR drive with an experienced driver, so I opted for the David Leadbetter golf lessons that were right outside the Omni Hotel in Orlando.
If you fly, you know that if an aircraft is late, there’s a good chance that you’re going to miss your connection or be late for something else in your day. It’s the reason the government and outside companies monitor the on-time arrival of airlines.
If you suspect that the economy has become your crutch, toss it aside and take responsibility to walk on your own two feet again. Adjust strategy and tactics, get creative with marketing and sales, and find ways to revive assets that have been nearly dormant since the downturn started.
Now that the economy has changed, her marketing manager stands out like a sore thumb and Tiffany’s patience has run thin. Her challenge is how does she make the change without spooking the employee or even others within her organization?
When our kids were 4 and 5 years old, they went through a brief stage where they would argue over whose turn it was to select and watch the program airing on the family-room TV. Since we limited television time overall, we wanted to come up with a fair solution that took us parents out of the equation and allowed the kids to solve their own problem. So I created a tool to empower them to do just that. It was a daily chart reaching out over 6 months at a time. The chart would work in 30-minute intervals and the kids alternated days. They used to define who had control over the TV by their half-hour mark.